These past couple of months have been weird in that I've not really felt like being a "comicky" person at all. This is odd because if there's been one constant in my life for the past thirty-odd years it's been comics. Music, football, speedway, girls, beer - all have come and gone and come again but comics have stayed the course. If I look back, I can probably only have two or three "interests" at any one time, and this is why the others fall by the wayside to be replaced by something new, but comics? Hmm. I'm still reading them, occasionally, on my tablet, but there's four weeks' wroth sitting at the comic shop and I haven't drawn one in two months. Ah, well, I'm sure I'll get back on that particular horse once the weather stops being stupid.
Of those I've read recently, none have made as big an impact on me as The New Deadwardians. It's a crime procedural set in an alternate Victorian era, where the dead have risen and the upper classes have taken a cure to prevent them falling prey to becoming zombies. The cure, although not explicitly stated, is heavily implied to have turned them into vampires, and all that that entails. It's really very good, and I hope there's a sequel. I didn't write this, though, to do some kind of review job. I want to tell you why it affected me so much. One of the central themes of the vampires' (called "the young" in the comic) lives is their lack of appetite for anything the living enjoy. They eat and drink, even though they no longer need to, because that's what they used to do. They feel no desire towards anything that could remotely be described as "sins of the flesh". They are more dead than the zombie-like creatures they sought to avoid becoming.
Now here's the thing, the whiny, woe-is-me, isn't my life terrible thing: I feel the same way much of the time. I get no genuine pleasure from much of what I do. I only know that I should and that one day the memory of the things that I've done might spark some pleasant, nostalgic feeling. I participate in and even seek out new experiences, but I'm not sure that I ever really enjoy them. Is that odd? Am I alone in this? And if this is what's happening to me, why on earth do I insist on pretending to like things hat cost me money rather than free non-entertainment? Life, eh? It's an anti-duck. On the surface paddling like mad but underneath as dead as anyone who ever took the cure...
The ghosts - because what else could they be? Insubstantial, howling things, all tortured faces and terrible masques, intangible trails and chilling touches. None more ghost - whipped the room into a frenzied cyclone of pain and torment, encircling the girls as they huddled together for security they knew was not going to be found. The eldest of the two whispered that everything was going to be alright, as much to herself as to the younger girl, and though neither of them believed it there was some comfort in her words. Of a sudden, the door flew open and the shape of a man stepped through, uttering an incomphrensible word that stulled and silenced the ghosts, who turned their unseeing eyes towards him. His face was covered by the brim of his hat, and with a long duster silhouetted in the low light from beyond the room, he looked every inch the cowboy from the Saturday morning picture show the girls had enjoyed in the life they had before this moment. He lifted his head and the eldest girl screamed - the youngest unable to utter a sound - at the sight of the shifting, unsettling mass that sat where his face should have been, as if what lay there couldn't quite exist in our world. With what passed for a smile in that shapeless morass the ghosts resumed their attack, the evanscent suddenly very, very real...
. . .
. . .
"Every has a right to have a favourite song." Good quote, innit? I made it up myself, whilst watching The Joy Of Easy Listening, which I'd taped off of BBC4 a few weeks ago. It - the show, not the quote - was about the genre that sprung up as technology brought music into people's homes and, as the young people had rock and roll and all that jumping and jiving music, filled a gap in the older generation's earholes. Easy Listening has been a much-maligned genre, in every incarnation of the music, from genuine soft orchestral music like Mantovani, Conniff, or Kampfaert, through the lounge music of Bacharach, Alpert, and Webb, the adult contemporary sounds of The Carpenters and Neil Diamond, right up to the hipster reclaimation of the form. All of it laughed at, derided by the music press and the cool people, but all of it brilliant. How could you not like music that is easy to listen to?
I've always been a fan. I didn't know that what I liked was Easy Listening until I heard it called that, around twenty years ago. I just knew that, of all the music my parents listened to, I liked this stuff the best. Bread rather than The Beatles. The Carpenters over Abba. Neil Diamond over Elvis Presley. But not Richard Clayderman. I wasn't deaf. The music I bought myself, my music, couldn't have been further from Easy Listening, all noise and angst and guitars and drums and youthful energy. But even then if a decent arrangement turned up I was all over it, I just didn't know why, and was probably a little bit ashamed. But by the mid-90s I knew, and I wasn't worried any more. I called the university music society I co-founded Easy Listening and I was probably the only one for whom it wasn't ironic. I even put The Carpenters on the flyer, hidden amongst Green Day, The Beastie Boys, and Nirvana, but mistyped it "Carpetners" - perhaps the shame wasn't all gone, subsonciously at least.
The music that is lumped under the umbrella title Easy Listening is actually a whole host of things but the one thing that unites it is that, somewhere amongst the thousands and thousands of songs, is the favourite song of people who you don't think really like music, like your Dad or your Nan. Everyone has a right to have a favourite song and there has to be a favourite song for everyone - chances are, it's got strings on it and it's something you don't have to think particularly hard about...